We went to the Puyallup County Fair yesterday. (One pronounces
Puyallup "pyoo-WALL-up.") Lots of fun. We saw all the piglets and
the horses and cows, etc. I got to pet a llama, and I checked out the
goats and bee-keeping exhibits.
It sounds like the location of the
Australian game on ShockWave's Shockmachine, called Lenny's Walkabout.
This is set in the outback town of Pullyapantsup. Another of Natasha's
favourites, it was a free download we got when getting all the Chicken Run
stuff.
Well, that's kind of like Puyallup. They have the farm
fair, but they also have a lot of domestic abuse and drug use.
Woo-hoo!
Cindy has llamas at the bottom of her garden, a farmer
keeps them in an adjoining field. Natasha was
fascinated.
So am I. I love their faces.
I adore both goats (and goat cheese) and bees and my fond dream, if I ever
live out in the country, is to keep one or both. I was reminded of how
exceedingly undelicious a billy goat smells. (Is that Artyom's
problem? Is he part billy goat?) But then, I guess the nanny goats
find the smell attractive.
I haven't seen any nanny goats showing
any interest. Maybe because he doesn't have a job right
now.
See, tell him that if he were cleaner girls wouldn't care if he had a job
or not, as long as he smelled good and kissed well. That means brushing
his teeth, so he'd better do that while he's at it.
I also ate way too much cotton candy (candy floss), an ear of roasted sweet
corn with jerk seasoning on it, a corny dog (hot dog wrapped in corn bread dough
and fried, served on a stick with mustard) and several samples of honey, which
they are trying to market as a pick-me-up in a little straw. They had it
with all sorts of non-honey-like flavors, too, like mint. Yuck.
What's wrong with plain honey flavor?
I adore heather honey, which has a
decidedly non-honey-like flavour. We can only get it sporadically here,
and from specialist deli's. It seems to be available most of the time in
Scotland though, so we occasionally get some on visits to my
parents.
Yes, it's good. We grew up on orange blossom honey, which is also
much better than standard clover honey (which is the standard in the
U.S.) In Hawaii we got kiawe (mesquite) honey, and that's
terrific. It has a little bit of a smoky taste to it. What do
y'all like honey on? I like it on peanut butter sandwiches and
toast. I also make a good honeyand mustard chicken thing.
On toast or sandwiches
mostly.
Mmmm, hot buttered toast with honey getting very loose and melting into
the little holes. All we have in the house right now is black
pumpernickel. It doesn't suit my toast fantasy.
And I brought home a piece of fudge which had BETTER NOT have disappeared
last night, as I was sleeping. I will be upset.
I have married me a man
who hates to go on even the tamest carousel, and so I was forced to watch in
envy as people rode slingshots and roller coasters and etc. I, on the
other hand, love the scariest rides. It's an opportunity to shriek at the
top of your lungs. If I ever marry again, believe me, this is something
I'm going to check out before I get engaged.
I told you about the theme park trip
last month.
Nuh-uh. It must have been one of yer other Internet
wimmin.
Hmm. I wonder why
not, it went in several letters, but a lot happened around that time.
During the summer holidays my parents came and looked after Natasha for a
week, and took her to London to see my sister and to see the show
Cats. She would really
love me, then. I can sing everything from "Cats." A youth
misspent. Then later she went there for a week. This
arrangement allowed me to clear some of the larger jobs off my backlog, ones
which meant staying on site for several days. It was great that they
could do this because they having both been ill, I had thought that such
excursions were a thing of the past. In between Cindy filled in as
usual, but she needed a day off for some reason. I forget now, it
might have been to do with John's illness. I needed to visit two
factories in the midlands. I did a deal with Natasha, we'd go
van-camping, she'd put up with one day hanging around factories, and I'd
take her to Alton Towers, a big theme park in the midlands, the next
day. It sounds like good
fun. So we drove down that night, slept over near the first
factory, and in the morning she sat in the reception office with the
receptionist while I dealt with the job. This was a small family
factory, so it was no problem. Then we drove over to the other
factory, stopped for a Burger King lunch on the way, and she played in the
van while I did that job. Then we drove over to Alton Towers and found
a restaurant for dinner, and spent the night nearby. So we were
through the gates as soon as they opened and spent the day there. We
were lucky with the weather, it had rained heavily the previous day, but we
got mostly sunshine and temperatures in the mid
twenties.
Natasha was keen to go on the scariest
rides permitted for her height, although she shunned certain
types.
What's the height requirement there?
48"?
There is a different rating
for each ride. The highest is 1.4m, most of the 'adult' (I mean
non-kiddy, not porn) rides are rated 1.2m. She is about
1.27m.
We went on the Corkscrew roller
coaster, which had a few unpredicable g-changes that could be quite
disconcerting.
Yaaaaaaaay! Did you throw your hands in the air?
Yaaaaaaay!
She came off looking white, and not
sure if she enjoyed it, but recovered her colour in about two minutes and
decided she had. She loved the Log Flume, rode it several times until we
were quite wet, and on one occasion spent most of the ride shouting that she
hadn't screamed.
Now, see, I'm not fond of log flumes unless it's very hot
outside. What, it was 23 or 24? C then? No way, José. Too
chilly for me -- or at least too chill to wander around soaked to the
skin. I'm such a dainty little flower. (snort)
It wasn't cold enough that you'd
notice being wet. Natasha insisted on going
barefoot.
Oh, God. Do you have hookworm there? I've grown up in the
subtropics most of my life, and while I can go barefoot in Hawaii all the
time, I wouldn't dream of doing it in the Mainland U.S.
Hookworm. Eeeeeeew.
Unlike the two teenage girls in front
of us, over who's screams she was shouting to be heard.
Well, yes, I am famous for my steamwhistle scream which I do on
rollercoasters. That's one of the joys of being or having been a teenage
girl; that's one of the skills you develop. My oncologist has forbidden
me to ride any such things for the time being, and I am just so mad I can't
see straight. So I'm sucking down as much pamidronate as they will give
me and taking calcium supplements, to build my treacherous bones up.
There is no ride at a fairground or theme park which I will not go
on. The sole exception is Ferris wheels. I don't like those very
much. It's the backwards and down motion which disconcerts me. As
long as I'm going forwards, I don't care what's going on.
I recall being
fascinated by the effects of watching filmed roller-coasterrides in
'immersion' widescreen cinema. We have an IMax in Bradford, and I also
saw something smaller but similar in a fairground show in Canada where they
had a hemispherical inflated tent and were projecting the film on the
inside. You still get a lot of the sensations without the
acceleration. I learnt with these things that what matters is keeping
your eyes locked on the 'target' point, the point of zero angular velocity,
like you do when
driving or biking. What roller-coasters do is to
apply sudden accelerations in unexpected directions to move the target
around rapidly and try to break your lock and disorientate you. If you
can anticipate where the target is going to go next, then you don't get
disorientated and it's just fun because you feel in control.
Yes. There used to be a ride at
Disney World called "Eastern: the Wings of Man." It was sponsored by
Eastern Airlines, they of glorious memory. At one point, your little
car moved on a track into a hemispherical dome with a scene of great speed
projected on it, and a fan blew wind in your face. One year I looked
down, and saw the track below just creeeeeeeeping along. I never saw
it as "fast" again.
Does that make
me a control freak? Well, it
makes you sound like someone who can only go on outdoorr
rollercoasters.
Its a bit different if the target goes out of
sight, like behind you or underneath ( e.g. on the high-point of a
rollercoaster). Then you can't track it, and when it comes back in
sight it may be hard to reacquire.
Natasha didn't want to go on a simple
centrifugal ride, cars hang on wires from a tower that spins around.
Possibly because it goes quite high and you have to look down. Or
possibly because it was boring. Oh, those look boring but they are a lot of fun. They
feel like you're flying.
There was one weird ride.
There was about 20 minutes of preparation while they tell you ghost stories,
then they lead you into a hall like a church and sit you down on pews,
facing across the hall from either side, not along it as in church.
With suitable lighting effects the pews start to rock like a swing.
The trick is that the room outside also rotates to make the oscillations
look bigger until you seem to be completely inverted. The pews then
come to rest at what is actually bottom dead centre, but your eyes are
telling you is top dead centre. Of course it only works if you watch
the walls. People who spent the time watching the pews on the other side,
like Natasha, couldn't see the point of it, it was just a
swing.
Sounds like fun.
There's a rollercoaster on top of the Stratosphere hotel in Las Vegas
which I am keen to ride. It's a regular rollercoaster, except it's about
thirty stories up in the air. Whee! Neither my father (who lives
there) nor my husband will go on it with me, and my doctor won't allow me
to. But! I am going to, at some point, if I have to arrange
for full-skeleton titanium replacements, dammit.
Like I said before, I think the doctor
is being a bit overprotective. I can't see that a roller coaster puts
any more stress on your hips and thighs than walking on them does. Has
he any evidence of patients actually sustaining fractures in this
way?
He's not really worried about my hips and thighs, but about my spine in
the case of the rollercoaster.
Today I am going to eat only water, nuts, and a boiled egg, in an effort to
recover from all that sugar yesterday.
Gotta go. It's time to get
involved with laundry. I like to do that before the house gets too hot,
because climbing up the stairs in the (hot) afternoon with a (hot) load of
fresh-out-of-the-dryer clothing is no fun whatsoever.
Hey, does Natasha have access to a
CD player or cassette player? I thought of something else that would be a
good Christmas present from America.
She has a cassette player, and the CD in her computer will of
course play audio too.
I made some molasses/spice cookies yesterday to take over to a friend's
house. They were so good I have to make some more, so we can have a whole
batch for ourselves. It was a nice change from chocolate (my thing) and
oatmeal-raisin (David's thing).
Sounds
like you could get together over a chocolate
flapjack.
Bleah. I hate pancakes. And a chocolate
pancake is an abomination. That's because maple syrup goes on pancakes,
and maple and chocolate DO NOT go together. So there.
Ah, divided by a common language.
An English flapjack is not a 'blin', it is a sort of thick rectangular biscuit
made from rough oatmeal bonded together with sugar syrup. Chewy, very like
cereal bars. The chocloate variant is dipped for about half its
length in chocolate, leaving an undipped area you can hold without getting your
fingers messy. The dip is traditionally done at an artistic jaunty
angle.Mmmm. Sounds
yummy. As long as it doesn't have raisins in it, I'd like it.
On the subject of pancakes, Natasha likes blini, but will not eat
Yorkshire pudding. My Yorkshire pudding batter is exactly the same recipe
as Lyudmila's blini. I proved this the other day, I roasted some beef and
made half a pint of Yorkshire pudding batter. I used about half of this to
make puddings in the oven. Natasha refused them, but then said she wanted
a pancake. Well, why not, so I poured some of the remaining batter into a
frying pan, and she ate two of them. Russians eat them with melted butter,
English with lemon juice and sugar, Natasha with Nutella chocolate hazelnut
spread, just to upset you.
Do you serve syrup on blinis, or what? That's weird.
We serve them with anything you feel
like. Jam, honey, fruit juice, melted butter, Nutella, anything that
spreads. In Russia it's always melted butter. We sometimes serve
them stuffed, eg with ratatouille, but Natasha doesn't like
that.
I love Yorkshire pudding. I also like blinis. As far as I know,
blinis are made with buckwheat, not flour. What we call pancakes are made
with wheat (white) flour, sour milk, a little baking powder, and sugar.
I've seen 'n' different recipes and ways
of making them. I think there are regional variations too. When
Lyudmila made them she used wheat flour, old-ish milk and an egg, which is the
same as I do for Yorkshire puds, or for Shrove Tuesday pancakes. There is
a certain amount of "whatever is available" here. I imagine buckwheat
would be more common. There was also a variant which used yeast, and was
used for coating pieces of apple etc., and shallow fried, something midway
between blini and piroshki (fried pasties). She use to cook whole
buckwheat grains in water to make "buckwheat kasha". We sometimes ate it
with chilli.
Yum. I make whole buckwheat grains with butterfly pasta and gravy and
know that as kasha varnishkes, a Jewish dish.
We're currently arguing on whether to acquire a couple of cats. I say
no, David says yes. This is getting hairy and unamusing.
We have a cat, who adopted us around the time we got married.
She's cute but sometimes annoying. She knocks all the papers off my desk
while seeking attention, and destroys the furniture. She is sitting on the
desk meowing at me now. I have sworn that I will not replace any suite,
chairs or anything while the cat lives, because I could not face having
expensive new stuff scratched to destruction. She also has an annoying
habit of leaving food in her bowl and demanding more. If you give
her more she won't eat it because by then the first lot is rotting. She
used to make her own yoghurt - if I gave her milk she would ignore it until it
went solid, then eat it.
She was hanging around before Lyudmila came, but I
would not let her in. Of course Lyudmila fed her and brought her in, so
then we were stuck with her. I was brought up with cats, so I don't really mind,
but of course it always ended up being my job to feed her etc. Especially
etc.
Awwww. Is she litter-box trained? See, I am fairly
obsessed with keeping a clean house. I HATE HATE HATE going into a house
and smelling cats. As a result, my cats are always only inside cats, I
clean out the litter box several times a day and wash it with boiling water once
a week, and etc. Inside cats don't get fleas or ear
mites.
She is pretty much an indoor cat, and
uses a litter box if she can stand it. It does not often get cleaned out but
it lives in the cellar, well away from noses. She prefers to go outside
for that anyway, but if it gets too bad then she finds another spot in the
cellar. If I have been doing woodwork down there and not swept up,
sometimes I come and find all the sawdust swept into a neat little pile.
BEWARE, it's not just sawdust. She never had fleas or
anything.
Wow. Lucky you. Maybe fleas aren't as bad in
England because of the weather -- I remember that the Hallidays' cats and my
godmother's cats never had them.
I had a bad experience with cat fleas back in the early1980's.
I took in a sofa for a couple who were moving to rented accommodation with the
husband's change of job. Trouble was the wife was blind, and the guide
dog used to sleep on this sofa. She swore it never had fleas (how would
she know?) but my animal-free house was heavily infested after a couple of
weeks. Forensic tests led back to the sofa as follows. My
assistant (I had an office and staff in those days) kept finding the odd flea
on her cat, and couldn't get rid of them. Then she found they were in
the office, and it occurred to her maybe she was carrying them home. So
I checked and found them at home. A lot. Decontamination
procedures started. I asked for the council fumigators to come, but that
took a couple of weeks to schedule, and by then I had almost solved the
problem. White pants tucked into white socks made a good biohazard suit
and killing field. Just walking around was a good way of trapping the
last few, using my warm body as bait. Double-sweep vacuuming cleared
large areas - you sweep a band across the room, then step back a couple of
feet and do it again. They can jump about a foot or so, and take minutes
to recharge after jumping, so any that jump the vac into the clean zone are
dead in the water for the second sweep. The same logic explains why beds
have legs at least a foot long. But no matter what, I couldn't clear
them off the sofa. By the time the council came that was the only place
they were.
Your cat is cute. We don't
have that many cats that have that kind of markings here. We call those
calico cats.
I think she is known
as a tortoiseshell here. I said we should call her Michelle (my-'shell)
but Natasha insists on Sukie. She never really had a name, just 'Cat', or
sometimes Katya, but never that when Lyuda's mother was here, she's Ekaterina
(abbr. Katya) too, and it wouldn't be polite. Katya was because she has
learnt to respond to the Russian Kss-Kss sound instead of the English
Tsch-Tsch.
Ahh. Well, it looks as
though I have won this round of David Wants A Cat (or Two) by pure luck.
We got back from Oregon (where we had gone for David's brother-in-law's
birthday) on Monday. We went and looked at these two Maine Coon cats
yesterday. They were utterly gorgeous but very shy, and David's feelings
were hurt. They also had fleas, and the woman who bred them was giving off
a very weird vibe. On the way home, David reluctantly said, "You know, I
don't think those cats were a good idea. By the time they came out from
under the beds, their coats would be matted and we'd have to have them shaved.
" Reluctant agreement. He thinks he's been the adult. I am
pleased and will allow him to do so.
Grrrr. I ordered some custom-made ear plugs from a hearing-aid
place. They should be in tomorrow. I can't wait. Awake again
at 03:15.
I have a long day ahead of me. I have three batches of cookies to
make and a lot of laundry to do. We are leaving at 6:00 tomorrow morning
for the bi-annual meeting of David's old Mensa friends in Lake Tahoe.
Woo-hoo, she said drearily. I wouldn't mind it so much except we are
driving. It will be at least two days on the road, and two days
back. Oh, well. If I can survive this, I can survive anything.
Let's see, my math tells me that I only have 120 hours in which I must be
pleasant. Hey, I've had Jackson-Pratt pumps in my leg for longer than
that. Of COURSE I can do it.
We had airline tickets, but September 11 changed that. David cashed
them in. I screamed and pleaded and swore (and even tried logic -- I
figure the safest time to fly would have been the past couple of weeks and now)
and David was obstinate. He did NOT want to fly. Then the airlines
started selling tickets at unheard-of prices to get the flying public back in
the air. I casually left the newspaper lying around, open to the page that
said Alaska Air had ROUNDTRIP tickets from Seattle to Reno for $49.
Well! Financial good sense overcame fear of a fiery death, and David
started calling around yesterday. Alas, it seems that everyone else
developed the same courage; the cheap flights are sold out, and the fares have
gone up, and we are back to driving.
I must go now. I'll keep
you posted as I have time, but if you don't hear from me until next week, don't
worry.
:
Phew, I just got home. How lovely.
Welcome back. I am glad that David seems to
have overcome his dislike of flying - he says that "next time" we will
fly. Ha. He doesn't know that I'm not going next
time. It's a waste of my time.
I just got in from a work trip, I've
been driving seven hours today (as well as working). I've had a nice few
weeks without any major trips, a nice change after hectic August. Today
reminded me how much I don't like driving. Why the hell suffer discomfort,
stress, aches and pains and bad food as well as risking life and limb when I
could be sitting comfortably in front of my computer?
Yes! Though I must say, we were extremely lucky in our choices of
restaurants on the way. We didn't have a bad meal, and we had quite a
few great ones.
Even if the occasional crazy wants to
fly a few planes into the ground, I'm sure flying is still much safer than
driving, mile for mile. It's airlines that are falling out of the sky, not
airplanes. It wouldn't occur to me not to fly just because of one oddball
off-the-wall event, however catastrophic. Yes. I was scared to death at some points en route - both
because of David's driving and other people's driving. Eeeek.
Leave it to the professionals. It doesn't take a lot to persuade me
not to drive. Anyway, they'll probably bomb the channel tunnel next, that
always struck me as a tempting target. From what we hear, most of the trains
have a few Afghan refugees hidden in underfloor toolboxes and the like.
This appears to be currently the only 'official' way of applying for political
asylum here! I'm sure it is not beyond the wit of the terrorists to
stuff one with explosives and indoctrinate him to go off half way through the
tunnel. Oh, and to drop a list of instructions in Arabic near the entrance
signed by, I dunno, Gaddafi or someone ( or even better, implicating
Mossad!)
There was a thing in Newsweek today that made me laugh,
and here I quote:
"In 1995 Abdul Hakim Murad
was arrested for planning to kill the pope and blow up 11 American
airliners. Eager to learn more, the Philippine National Police
Intelligence Group beat Murad, forced water into bhis mouth, crushed lighted
cigarettes into his private parts, made him sit on ice cubes, threatened to rape
him, and told him that he'd never see the light of day in Manila." {the last is a threat I wish would be applied
to me.} "(Murad did
not spill, however, until the Filipinos threatened to turn him over to Israel's
Mossad for further interrogation.)"
I'm not sure exactly
*why* I'm laughing at that, but it did strike me as funny.
Afghan scientists have devised a
technique to encode anthrax spores into e-mail attachments.
These can be
reconstituted by exploiting a loophole in Microsoft Outlook Express.
Users
are recommended to fit additional exhaust filters to their
computers.
<g>
D'ye think we can start a panic?
Buy shares in
computer filter companies now!
PS, just heard about the Irish mail
virus. It says "Please delete everything on your hard disk. Mail a
copy of this letter to everyone in your address book".
Bwahahahahaha. So that's what that pipe
coming out the back of my computer is.
Life is entirely too pleasant
here. I have nothing to complain about yet. Had a lovely dinner last
night, watched a good movie, and woke up late today. Surely something
horrible is about to happen.
This made me giggle when I heard
it on a satirical program on BBC Radio 4.
"A man was charged with possession
of heroin, which police had found hidden between his buttocks.
He had
previously been convicted of offences involving crack cocaine."
Some sort of
fixation I suppose :)
Ooooh! Blush,
blush. Funny.
Sigh. David brought home a cat yesterday. His name is Jack.
He's gray. He's quite large, but still refuses to come out of the
crate. I wonder which of us will tire of this
first.
Observation
We develop
the muscles that suit the environment we live in. If a muscle is not big
enough to perform its daily tasks it becomes strained more frequently and a
growth process cuts in to enlarge it. If its capacity remains unused, then
it atrophies until occasional overloads bring it back into
balance.
Hypothesis
The growth of intellect is similar, if our mind is
inadequate to its daily tasks we become embarrassed more frequently and develop
our head muscle to combat this. Again, what you don't use you
lose.
Implication
It is normal for intellect to develop to a level
just adequate to remain functional in everyday situations and no more. I
think this is borne out by statistics. It may have some long term
evolutionary implications. Yes. I think this is correct.
Then why do some
of us go on developing it way beyond this simple requirement - weight-training
our minds.
Does this mean we spent a formative part of our lives in more or
less permanent embarrasment? Or was that just a normal part of
adolescence? Maybe there is some protein deficiency or overexpression that
prevents the process from shutting
down.
Maybe this goes to
metaphysical things like The Unquenchable Human Spirit, etc. I think
it's evolutionary. Those of our ancestors who were curious and wanted to
"develop" their minds (by seeing what happened if you ate an oyster, if you
could take back fire to your cave from a lightning-struck tree, etc) were the
ones who survived and passed their genes on.
Their descendents were
similarly antsy about their minds and what they can
do.
I think they are called kids, tearaways or
delinquents. I was trying to get at who and why. It is clear we
aren't all like that, so what are the factors that make a curious, inquisitive
individual?
I think the raw
matter of intelligence. Though I think a lot of intelligence is
environmental, some of it is innate, and even kids who don't receive
appropriate stimulation grow up to be curious about things.
Yes, and some don't. I guess it
takes both genetic and environmental factors. I'm think some kids are
born thick and some have thickness thrust upon them. I do feel that
intelligence can be destroyed by negative stimulus, such as peer pressure
that disparages learning or interest in
anything.
What I mean here is that while most people shut down
intellectual growth at the 'proper' time, others seem to go on indefinitely,
even though they seem perfectly capable of coping with their lives, and not
noticeably stressed. Why should they do this? Either there is some
unidentified cause, maybe genetic, maybe environmental, or else perhaps the
tendency becomes fixed at some stage in development. In the latter case,
if 'intellectual adequacy' has not been achieved by a certain stage in
development then the growth process will continue indefinitely. I don't
really see why that should be so, but it seems to happen like
that.
Perhaps we need to
study what intellectual adequacy is and make sure it doesn't happen to
anyone.
That sounds like a vote for bullying. I do have a
sneaking suspicion that there is a connection.
Is there an addiction to learning similar to addiction to
exercise? At 50 I still get occasional insatiable rushes to learn
something new. Why does satisfying them make me happy?
Because it's hard-wired into
you? Because you are an intelligent person and satisfying that
intelligence gives you a high similar to a runner's endorphin rush?
Because as a child you were rewarded when you learned something new, and thus
when you do, you feel pleased with yourself?
I think I'd go for the opiate chemistry rather than the Pavlovian
response - hence the suggestion it might be addictive like exercise
clearly is. Learning is a personal thing, and most of the important items go
undetected and unrewarded by others. Learning school lessons was really
pretty trivial compared to learning to survive and compete in the playground
or learning to
avoid punishments. The rewards are in the use, over
time.
But why should that work to encourage me to go on learning things I
really don't need, like geology or sailing or aerodynamics, while not
affecting millions for whom it could significantly improve their lives.
Is it genes, or potty training, or something much later in life?
You've stumped me. I
think that many people who we don't give credit for being intellectual
remain curious and engaged. Think of an old lady who is obsessed with
quilting.
Yes I have one next door, maybe I already told you.
She is 60-something, smokes like a 1962 Ford, comes from a background of
discouraging education of women in anything other than domestic science
and deportment, and of being seen as the runt of the litter. After
her husband died, and with the number of overbearing older relatives
dwindling, she was free to take her own decisions for the first time in
her life and did a degree in
psychology.
(By the way, how would you
feel about a mathematics professor in Scotland who is, to my eye, round but
not grotesque, quite pretty, and does really, really cool quilts? I
mean, how would you feel about being put into contact with
her?)
Um, do you mean romantically or intellectually? I don't
object to being put in touch with anyone. Well, within reason, I'd
pass on scientologists or other religious proselytisers. Is this the
"old lady who is obsessed with quilting" just mentioned? I find that
there are plenty of unattached intelligent older women around, and a
few make interesting correspondents, but as far as looking for a mother for
eight year old Natasha is concerned, they are non-starters. One
started out telling me how she liked taking off-peak holidays. It took
a few letters to get through to her that that
doesn't mix with school-age
children.
So as far as romantic involvement is concerned, my basic rules
are, younger than me, non-smoking, bright enough to appreciate me, and in
reasonable physical and mental health. After that it is just a matter
of falling in love.
There are a few unattached females among the school
parents, and not all totally thick or unattractive, (although none I would
classify as either cute or intellectual) but as far as I know every single
one smokes!
Somewhere in here is the difference between creative stress and
depressive stress. Yes I, and anyone, gets a kick from achieving
something. The good thing about my job is that I do a job and see the
result straight away. A photographer has to wait for the film to be
developed, a teacher has to wait for the child to grow up, but fixing machines
gets instant kicks. People (psychologists) have said that stress in
achieving something is healthy and good for you, constructive stress. If
the achievement is difficult and stressful then the kick is all the
greater. But if the stress does not result in achievement, it is
destructive and leads to depression.
Why do we feel that we are in some way superior to the others.
From one point of view we are no more superior than muscle builders.
Perhaps this is because society finds value in these freaks, and does not
understand how to create them to order.
Hey, speak for yourself!
But
seriously, I feel superior to someone whose muscles are freakishly
overdeveloped because I know that I could probably come up with better ideas
on how to use those muscles than he or she could.
-
Yes, and I have some sneaking
feelings that way, myself. I thought you were getting close to the
self-congratulatory note that many Mensa members seem to project.
Count the [indents]. You wrote
that, you are agreeing with yourself. Looks like I didn't comment on it
but didn't snip it either. It just got lost in the length of the
mail. I don't see any real point in muscle development, but I'm thinking
that perhaps mental development is similarly overrated.
The Mensa
phenomenon is strange, don't they notice that people are laughing at
them? They whine about it,
not realizing that they bring it on themselves. A bit like American
foreign policy - do what you feel like and just assume everyone loves you:
until they get mad enough to let you know otherwise.
But these are not the people society generally rewards - society mostly
rewards dominant characters - bullies and spivs. Intellectuals are often quite
retiring.
Is this development fixed at some early time on life, perhaps
adolescence?
Oh, yes. I think it all
goes back to the way you were raised. I have friends, for example, who
graduated from the Bronx High School of Science. In that school, the
"cool" kids were the ones who scored highest on tests, etc. They were
rewarded for that, and as a result, those people are not at all
retiring. They are proud of themselves and what they can do. They
also exhibit some unattractive character traits, like bullying, boasting, and
other things that I don't like to associate with intelligent
people.
Are the latter traits endemic among people brought up in the Bronx or
are they specific to Science School graduates?
(snicker) Well, there is a
stereotypical truth there, but what I was trying to say is that the jock
bullying and boasting that I saw in my schools seemed to be transferred to be
intellectual bullying and boasting at BSS.
...
I think that stress, in the
context of psychology, is the same thing as embarrasment, but viewed over a
longer term.
I'm not clear on this.
To clarify. I am
propounding the theory that intellectual development is prompted by
embarrassment, and that the system forms a homeostatic control loop - a
negative feedback system - at least for part of our lives. If you are
faced with a situation that you don't have the mental equipment to handle,
that is embarrassment. Maybe you are in a social group where you are
aware that certain behaviours are expected, but you don't know what the rules
are. Maybe you have committed yourself to performing a task but don't
know how to go about it. Now in homeostatic circumstances
(where
intelligence grows to meet demand), these incidents will happen
occasionally, in the same way that muscle strains will happen occasionally if
you are just fit enough for your lifestyle.
Hmm, well, yes, this could be
true, but I'm not sure how it works regarding an historical development of
intelligent. I mean, out on the african savannah in the dreamtime of
the human race, did our fore-apes become embarrassed when a lion stole their
carrion?
Only if they had nothing else to eat. It would be
trivially embarrassing to die of having your meals stolen. It would
be seriously embarrassing to have your dependents die of it.
BBC is
doing an edutainment computer animated series called 'Walking with
Beasts', a sequel to the popular 'Walking with Dinosaurs' and covering
among other things early primates. (It is a bit poor IMHO but the
kids like it).
They mentioned that the Australopithecine learned to eat
meat which provided the nutrients to allow a major growth in brain
size. Maybe that explains our vegetarian
friends.
Have you read any Jared Diamond?
I don't think so. Not a name I
recognise.
I highly recommend a book of his called "Guns, Germs and
Steel." It talks about human intelligence in some surprising ways.
I suggest that stress is
the pressure to increase intelligence produced by these events - if the
homeostasis occurs then it is maintained at a low level by the control loop,
if that fails then stress may increase without bound. Causes of the
control systems failing to track may be rapid changes in demand, or physical
limits to (in this case) growth. (From "control systems 101".)
What I could
not decide was whether this is only a feedback loop up to a point where
development ceases (like a baby who's eyes were bandaged from birth grew up
blind because necessary neurological connections failed to develop), or
whether there is some other reason for control failure. I suppose the
most likely scenario is that development on some level ceases at adolescence,
and from then on you are on your own with whatever you got. So if
adolescence was traumatic you may end up over endowed with learning ability,
if it was undemanding you may end up unable to learn new tricks.
I'm not
sure that quite fits, but the idea that a traumatic adolescence or childhood
is a cause of intelligence rather than a consequence of it sounds worth
exploring.
Reference is often made to "the stresses of modern life", it is
perceived that life has become much more stressful recently, despite having also
become more comfortable and easier.
I think that the stresses of
modern life are also caused by our mores not having kept up with our
technological ability.
Does automation create
stress?
Yes. Now, if the electricity is not on or the machine
doesn't work, we have to a) fix the machine and b) do the job the machine is
designed to do when it *does* work.
Labour-saving devices
relieve us of monotonous tasks. This is supposed to free our time for
'leisure', but in fact we are likely not to actually use the freed time for
leisure but to compete. We cannot compete with machines at
labour-intensive tasks, we can only compete with each other in the areas on more
intellectually demanding areas on which machines cannot encroach.
Or we try to keep up with the Joneses.
Hmm, but mostly the machine does work. Even if the machines
worked perfectly the competition stress would still be there. To keep up
with the Joneses we have to earn as much money as the Joneses. We can't
do that by just working longer hours at heavy labour any more. The
bottom fell out of the manual labour market because machines do it
cheaper. The only way to get ahead is to push one's skills to the
limit. That means spending more of your time attempting tasks beyond
your ability, or solving scheduling/starting-point type problems, and getting
destructive stress.
I believe that trying to
fill our time competitively is the source of "modern stress" - we worry because
we have time to worry.
ABSOLUTELY. When one is in
a struggle to survive the elements (e.g. farmsteading on the prairie in 1885)
one doesn't have time to agonize about one's childhood sexual abuse, or
whether or not one's mate understands one.
If it is true that
intellectual development is mainly fixed at adolescence, then the stress
will be increased in two ways. Firstly, the 'modern' society makes more
intellectual demands on adults, but not on adolescents. Secondly, those
now suffering as adults went through their development at a time of lower
demand.
But because human society and its capabilities are continually
growing and changing, this has been happening ever since we stepped out of the
caves. All generations harken back to the good old days, when life was
simpler.
Oh, true, but I think there is evidence that the rate of change has
is increasing, and the size of the problem is proportional to the rate of
change.
I don't think change occurs at a
constant rate, and I think we have seen eras of comparable swift change in
technology in other eras, e.g. in Europe after the pandemics of bubonic plague
in the thirteenth century and in both Europe and the U.S. during the
Industrial Revolution. Don't forget, there were people then who
conceivably could have been born in exceedingly primitive conditions in, say,
1805, who could have lived to see electric lighting, telegraphs, telephones,
etc. I think that is a far more significant change than say, someone
born in my cohort has
faced in their lifetime.
You may be right. It is received wisdom that we are in an era
of unprecedented change, but it may well be that the transmitters of wisdom do
not look far for precedent. I think it is indisputable though that we
are on an upswing, that in our lifetimes the rate has increased, and
that I think is a source of stress.
A corollory of that is that
intellectuals should not be susceptible to this stress, but should be seen by
others as unaware of their 'real' world..
My personal experience is that
stress comes when I have a lot of competing tasks and no obvious priority.
Yes. Or when there's no
clear starting point.
I am happiest when I know what I have
to do next, for example when I can work my way systematically and uninterrupted
through a single large project. I think that scheduling is the most
demanding task. I
agree.
Modern stress is the outcome on society of
automation. What in the sixties we imagined would bring the 'workless
society' actually brought the 'financial services industry', an entirely
parasitic form of work which creates no wealth at all, really just a form of
institutionalised gambling. This is our recreation and it automatically expands
to take up whatever slack is created. It is true that the Devil makes work
for idle hands. It was an error to believe that the masses would embrace
idleness.
(As computers were supposed to bring the paperless office but
actually brought desk-top publishing.)
That isn't just a fantasy: as we have
automated we have come to expect to spend more of our lives in 'idleness', in
the form of retirement.
Well, and don't forget advances
in public health. A hundred years ago it was rare to live into
retirement. One worked and dropped dead in the traces. As old age
becomes more and more productive, retirement will become shorter and
shorter. People will still be working and adding to their pension funds
in their mid seventies.
One would have expected the response to increased longevity to be to
increase retirement age in line with the demography. Our failure to do
this (so far) and even (at least in the 80's) a trend toward early retirement
is a large reduction in work in 'real terms', and is a true measure of our
idleness. In the trade press there are regular discussions about ageism
in the workplace. Oddly, all the opinions voiced are anti-ageism, and
yet it is very difficult for anyone over 40 to move jobs in technology.
I am still waiting for its proponents to come out of the woodwork and explain
themselves.
They don't have to. They are
the ones doing the firing.
Yes but the media claim to have an ageism debate going. You
can't have a debate with only one side present.
We clearly do not properly utilise the skills and work potential of
the (what is now) middle-aged group. At 50 I can even get an age
discount on the long-distance buses! It is not so much a discount, as
that they charge a premium to passengers aged between 26 and 49. Under
26 you can get a student discount.
Yup. David (my husband) is
52, and, though he held on for a good long time, finally got his layoff notice
for the end of January. He is blithe about his ability to find a new job
(which is why Natasha's Christmas present was sent air mail), but I'm not so
sanguine.
Oh dear. The mobile phone industry seems to have punctured its
bubble. I hope he is right.
So do I, so do I. I feel
terrible. I'm not sure that I can handle being married to him if we're
poor. I know that this is terrible, but I don't have anyone else I can
tell my terrible thoughts to.'
"Well, its what we're here for." (That was the Help Desk
'sign-off' when I worked at Shell, if someone actually said
thanks)
Well, he's being flown to Massachusetts next week for an interview, so
SOMEONE wants him.
You mean HE goes for an interview
and THEY pay his expenses. Wow, I haven't had one of those since I
left University. But then I haven't had an employer since about 1981
anyway so what do I know?
Yes. They are paying his expenses. Oh, heavens,
I'm praying. I'm actually very nervous at the thought of living on the
East Coast. It seems so far away from Hawaii. Silly,
yeah?
The way the industry has gone just beggars belief, I thought that
sort of commercial naivety died out in the 19th century. When they
started announcing the prices paid for the 3G licenses my jaw nearly hit the
floor. How anyone thought they could recover that I have no idea. It
seems that a flawed business model took root somewhere and propagated through
the industry. Like a chain letter. "Give me 8 billion pounds, then
develop a product and send it to the top ten million names on your
address
list asking them for two thousand pounds each. In no time the
money will be rolling in!" Suckers!
To achieve this we spend
our working lives investing our earnings with a view to receiving a
pension.
Yes, and yet medical science has
not yet come up with the problem-free old age. What is the point of
having lots of lovely cash when you are in your eighties, if you are too
physically ill to have fun with it?
On the other hand, its no fun being physically ill and not having any
cash to alleviate it. This longevity comes at a cost, which has to be
paid for somehow. It is increasingly becoming the case that we spend our
productive years buying health insurance for our old age. The
ever-stretched NHS budget is mostly spent on the elderly, and doesn't cover
most of the massive cost of caring for the elderly. Maybe we should
advocate smoking to help people die while still at a relatively undemanding
age. I am sure that this argument lies behind our Government's rather
equivocal stance on banning
smoking or punishing those who profit from what
is essentially mass murder. They know damn well that it is the only thing that
keeps the pensions industry from total collapse.
Yes, especially as the baby
boomers (those born 1949-1965) approach retirement
age.
In the process, the amount
of our labour involved in manipulating these investments has grown out of all
proportion, especially in the UK. It creates the illusion that the country
no longer needs industry or agriculture, but can entirely live by "taking in its
own wash", a sort of economic cannibalism. This fallacy was actually
espoused by some people in high places in the Thatcher years. It is a
fallacy of the perpetual motion type, for the entire engine is still driven by
wealth creation, take that away and the edifice must collapse through falling
interest rates, vanishing trading margins and negative balance of
payments.
Yes, and if something catastrophic ever happened to the
financial services industry, we would have millions of, essentially, drones
out of work. They would not know how to do anything
productive.
Maybe Douglas Adams' vision of the Golgafrincham 'B' Ark would come
true. We would pack them all into a spaceship and send them to colonise other
planets. He applied it to hairdressers and telephone sanitizers, but the
idea is the same. (The victims were told that the 'A' and 'C' arks
containing the rest of the population would follow shortly, but somehow they
never materialised.)
Aside no 1: In a radio documentary about a small and rather pointless
colony on the east coast of Greenland, one resident commented that their
economy consisted of "cutting each other's hair".
Aside no 2: On the
subject of foreign comedy getting into the US, have you ever seen the
'Pingu' animations for kids. I just heard on the news that they are to
be launched into the US, a multinational media company just bought the
rights. This is a modelling-clay stop-motion animation about a young
penguin and his friends, who speak in a guttural gibberish that has no
recognisable words, but expresses emotions well. It really is brilliant,
and truly international. Their CEO described it as "probably the best
stop-motion animation around."
Not yet, but I'm looking for
it. I have seen some of the merchandise, but the show hasn't
appeared.
(Ministers have said dafter
things. Recently it was briefly proposed to move the school holiday so
that it would not coincide with the peak demand for travel!)
:-o
Oh, my.
However, I support some changes in school schedules. For
example, the American habit of having a long summer off of school started up
when we were largely an agrarian society. Children were needed at home to
help on the family farm in the summer. Now there are very few children in
that situation, and we have learned that those long school vacations are
disastrous for year-to-year retention of learned material. Yet try to
switch to a year-around school schedcule, and parents, children and teachers
alike scream.
Oh, is that why we have a
long summer holiday. Well well. However I think that rationale is
suspect and exam-orientated. It presumes that retention after leaving
school is unimportant. "I'm about to have a life, I'd better start
revising!" Have they studied the effect of the holiday on
long-term retention? Oh, yes, and it's abysmal. I find that I
remember things permanently best if I am allowed to almost forget them and am
then reminded.
I have a general purpose PIN
number (not for my bank account but for trivial things like my screen-saver
password, instrument service access codes etc) which is a part number for a
motorcycle exhaust pipe that I had to remember for a few hours when I was
16. I can now never forget it.
That is the case for me
now, but not when I was in school.
I recall first noticing the effect in my first year at
university. Trying to remember a girl's name. It was Sarah.
And the year before, with a part number for a friend's motorcycle
exhaust. I had nowhere to write it down as I caught the bus into town to
get the part. It was 23059. Having that number stuck in my head,
it now gets used for all sorts of low-security PINs and passwords, for example
the 4-digit default engineer control access password on my industrial
controllers is 2305.
Sorry it took me so long to respond to this. I have been
very busy lately. I have begun volunteering at the Pedicatric Interim Care
Center, a center for drug-addicted babies who are going through
withdrawal. No, I'm not the madonna rocking the shrieking, stiffening
baby; I'm the ink-stained wretch in the office writing a grant to keep the roof
over the madonna's head.
We also have recently acquired a cat, and he
requires some time and care.
And winter is a drawing-in, so the
days are much shorter and there is a rush to get everything done before it gets
dark.
Glad to hear you are
doing something useful with your life and no longer just the Lady of the
Manor. :) Also very glad to hear you feel well enough to do
that.
Yes, and since then,
I've been in Austin at my sister's doctoral dissertation (as you know), been
on several long car trips with my husband, visiting long-lost relatives of
his, been completing my Christmas preparations (I am one of those women who
goes about it very early, with grim determination and lots of lists), and been
waiting for our Internet access to come back. We have AT&T broadband
service, and their ISP (Excite@Home) went belly-up. AT&T came
back up very quickly, I thought, but David has refused to follow the
directions about reconfiguring his computer and our router, and so I've been
doing most of my e-mail at the public library.
So much for
broadband. How are the mighty
fallen!
I have been at least as slow in replying. I wrote about 2/3 of
this on the day, timed out, then somehow the mental energy just wasn't there,
work seemed to be using it all up. This strange lethargy persisted the
whole time that Lyudmila's mother was staying. She went home last weekend
and it has begun to lift. I don't really think it was entirely her fault,
work has also been rather demanding, but three weekends out of four have been
spent ferrying her around the country, to and from London Airport, to and from
my parents in Scotland, so the 'free time' has been pretty non-existent.
Yes, and Lyudmila's mother being
there could have been depressing, bringing up memories of Lyudmila and her
illness, etc.
Not so much that, more the hassle of logistics and expense.
Lyudmila's illness and death never really had much emotional impact. I
mean yes at the time I felt like screaming but that was lack of sleep and
stress rather than any sort of grief. There was just too much to do to
sit around moping.
Last weekend we drove to London, stayed overnight at my sister's
because we just couldn't make the connection from Manchester unless we all flew
to London and back at prohibitive cost. We spent the afternoon going
around Kew Gardens, the national botanical 'museum' which is not far from
Heathrow. Quite interesting but rather boring for Natasha, who I think when
looking at a wood just saw a wood and was not impressed by all the different or
unusual species of tree. I think she was more interested in the
cafe.
I would have been, too, at that age, unless the huge stinky corpse
flower, whose name I can't remember, was blooming at the time. I think
y'all have got one at Kew.
Speaking of stinky corpses, a mystery writer
here, Patricia Cornwall, has invested $4 million of her own money in research
and has determined that Jack the Ripper was a well-known English Impressionist
painter, Walter Sickert. Hast thou heard sooth, and what thinks
thou?
If that is Patricia
Cornwell, I know the Dr Kay Scarpetta books pretty well, but I hadn't heard this
story, although I seem to recall having heard a reference to it somewhere.
Why not? Sounds like fun. I think it was generally thought he was an
intelligent and educated man, so it is likely he was well known in some other
sphere. Give $4M to a man and he would spend it on women. Give it to
a woman and she has to do something interesting with it. ;-)